Or, why I brought only dubious antique cameras to one of the best photo opportunities in the world.
I don’t know what cameras the Leakeys carried with them during their research in Tanzania in the 50s, but it is rumoured that Dr. Leakey complained bitterly about faulty bellows ruining his photographs.
Leakey Camp at Olduvai Gorge, mid-50s
Let me begin by explaining ‘what the hell I am thinking’ since that is an inquiry I have received several times about this matter.
I stomped my foot on the ‘real film only’ issue several years ago, just as digital kits started getting good enough to take proper photos and inescapably joined the endless technology race track to which we have all grown accustomed with our computers, televisions and toothbrushes. I am impressed with these technological advances in photography, just as I am impressed with my MacBook and new printer and the sonic toothbrush that keeps my teeth clean. The digital camera thing, however, doesn’t do it for me. I want a box with film in it and a little iris that gets bigger and smaller at my command. I understand this. I don’t understand how autofocus and vibration reduction works; it’s like black magic. I don’t know why suddenly ‘white balance’ is something to pay attention to and getting it right has critical impact on how your images turn out. I am sad that four gigs of memory and 60 shots in ten seconds have made the Decisive Moment irrelevant. In the interest of full disclosure, I will admit to conceding the inconvenience of a wet darkroom. I have a proper lab do all my processing and I handle the post-processing and printing in a digital darkroom with a fancy-pants scanner and printer. It works okay, but I definitely feel the pain of some lost resolution and other, intangible film qualities by finishing digitally. It hurts, but I am lazy.
My ‘film only’ rule evolved into a ‘classic cameras only’ rule, which in turn has fueled the growth of a steadily expanding collection of boxes with film in them. There is much discussion about what makes a camera classic. My benchmark used to be “before WWII”, then “older than I am”. Now it is a vague “anything before 1980 that is not an SLR and does not require batteries” category that permits me to buy nearly any contraption that captures my fancy and doesn’t upset my bank account. A few of them suck. Some take obsolete film that is now prohibitively expensive. I truly love them all.
When we decided to go to Tanzania I knew I would be using my old film cameras. Chris has a fancy-pants Nikon kit with monster lenses and all the aforementioned voodoo technology that enables a photographer to capture the bits of zebra fur clinging to a lion’s tonsils. He is damn good at using this kit and takes beautiful photos; I knew I could count on him to shower us in scores of stunning National Geographic style images. Me? Not so much. My cameras are more the “Hemingway got drunk in Kenya and rolled over on the Kodak again” variety, and I love them for that. I love the grittiness of film and the way sometimes no matter how careful I am the results still aren’t in sharp focus. I love the limitations: Inaccurate or nonexistent rangefinder, few (or two!) apertures, the expense of film and slow, one-at-a-time-then-wind shutter release that makes me take care, think about each shot and wait for the right moment. I love that for some reason, inexplicably, shots taken with my cameras look like they were taken with a vintage camera. Do I get frustrated and miss some awesome shots because I can’t take bursts or because the film winder is hung up or I have done something stupid? All. The. Time. Mostly the something stupid part. Do I also sometimes get some pretty good shots because I’m not carrying a hand cannon and no one notices I am taking their picture, or because they are interested in my crazy antique, or because I am patient and sneaky as hell? Absolutely. The lions don’t give a shit, but it sure can make a difference with the humans. Knowing I have fewer ‘chances’ makes me thoughtful about every time I press the shutter, even for landscapes or trees or stickerbushes or hippos.
When CW was busy fussing with with his giant lens to capture the elephants that would be only specs to my cameras, I got to watch them at my leisure and up close with kickass binoculars; no pressure. Or I could shoot the landscape, the ugly bird on the roof of the truck, and Chris at work with his kit. In fact, I wonder if I maybe got to actually see more stuff than he did.
CW near Lobo Lodge,Serengeti. Agfa Clack.
Hunting grounds, dry lake bed in the Serengeti. Voigtlander Perkeo.
I deviated a little from the cameras I originally planned to take. The Retina was left behind in a huff, and the Clack made the Holga seem redundant. A new acquaintance on Photo.net, Minh Nguyen, generously lent me a 616 Kodak he had converted to 120 format and it was so marvelous that I have sent him my own 616 to convert.
The verdict:
Agfa Clack: Truly a box with film in it. We took both horrid and great photos together, as usual. No regrets.
Serengeti Hippo Pool, Agfa Clack
Voigtlander Perkeo: I really love this camera and it performed as well as I allowed it to. It’s new to me so perhaps we need to get to know each other a little better, and I clearly need to practice my “squint and wing it” method of range finding. The Perkeo is beautiful. Hot, even. I am in love with it but we do not yet understand each other.
Yashica 44: This was a sure thing. It works pretty much just like my YashicaMat but is soooo little and cute and fun to use. Its small size magnifies its stealth capabilities; almost no one notices when you are shooting from the waist. The only drawback is not having a 127 mask for the scanner so it’s a trick to get the negatives digitally archived- someday I’ll fabricate something.
Converted Kodak 616: Surprise hit! Minh’s loaner arrived the day before our departure. I love these old folders, and Minh’s is much nicer than my (currently useless) 616. This thing makes MONSTER negatives at 6x12cm. Amazing. It was so much fun I am sending my 616 Jiffy to Minh for conversion. It’s not as nice as his, but will be good fun.
Serengeti, Kodak 616 converted to 120 Panorama
-brf
Recent Comments